Page 10 of 22

Posted: Wed Jul 09, 2003 10:57 pm
by Michael Burke
Hi Everyone,
Wow, this thread grew really fast. Too bad our European friend left the forum. He certainly contributed a thread that increased everyones interest in posting their views.
I waded through most of the stuff written and it seems to me that we are a very diverse group politically, religiously and also by temperament.
I am reminded of a passage in the New Testament, perhaps is in Paul's letter to the Phillipians where Paul talks about the virtue he practiced as a Pharisee and how he worked to perfect himself, and then one day he realized that he had failed to recognize that the sin of pride in his righteousness had blinded him and that he only thought he was perfect.
Many of us like to think we are broad minded and that we are tolerant of others and that we like to see all sides of an issue, but then someone comes along and this person is intolerant, rude, and narrow minded, and demands his own way.
What happens then is that we tend to forget all our tolerance and all our ability to see both sides of the issue and want to come down hard on that bigoted, ignorant person. The problem is that, all too often, we, in the process of attacking this threat, can become like them. It is easy to be tolerant of tolerant people, but very difficult to be tolerant of people that hate us without good reason.
But we owe to ourselves to not feed the demons in our own souls in a Crusade to fight evil, or what we perceive as evil.
What we need is perspective and what we need is a sense of humour to make it through life.
One of the things that I dislike about political correctness is that one can hardly express any opinion without offending someone.
Why not allow people to be who they are and accept them. We don't have to even like them, but allow them to be who they are and a part of our community.
Dale does a great service for whistlers by running this forum and the Chiff and Fipple. But really, folks, why should he have to apologize for sharing something that he experienced in Church? I am sure that the Jews, Muslims, and other religious people, including Athiests need not fear that they will catch anything by listening to his perspective. I have had very rich dialogs with a friend who is a very devout Muslim, and the local Rabbi in my town recently spoke to our Methodist Congregation. Does that mean that I don't have strongly held beliefs. Certainly not. But, the reason that the Rabbi was able to be invited to speak during Passover was that this Rabbi came and visited my pastor during serious illness and showed a real concern for him as a person. If we focus on our differences, we cheat ourselves out of a rich experience of getting to know extremely interesting people and learn about very interesting beliefs. But remember that those interesting beliefs are also beliefs that may be very strong and very passionate and may shake us up and even make us mad. But even those ideas are worth listening to, because they make us think and rethink what we hold to be true. To me, that is what it really means to be an American.
Remember, a lot of us got here because people where we came from didn't like us for some reason. But now that we band of outcasts and misfits have arrived on these happy shores, let us lift a glass and celebrate our differences and know that this is what makes us strong and interesting people to chat with on the forum.
And if Dale likes to try his hand at being a latter day Jonathan Swift or other satirist in his newsletter. then enjoy a chuckle on our President, he has big shoulders anc can take it, or if you don't like it, just hit the delete button. Compared to the other stuff I get on the email client, it is a joy to see it come up each month. And I enjoy, as a confirmed lurker, reading all of the interesting, crazy, funny, sad, disturbing things that people post on this site. We are a community and I wouldn't change a thing........... .... Errr, maybe a couple of things...... but I'll let that go ;)

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:06 am
by jim stone
Well said, Mike.


I always try to do the right thing(except for stealing nose flutes), but I won't try to be nice to somebody I don't want to be nice to. I'd rather tell them why I feel the way I do than fake manners and courtesy to them.

Being courteous and being 'nice' are different, I think.
One can tell somebody how one feels, even if it's
that one is angry with them or doesn't like what
they did, without being discourteous.


And I'd rather have somebody tell me the truth (even if it's not something I'd want to hear) and act their normal way than constantly ask if that was alright with me and say please and thank you and excuse me and stuff when that's not a part of who they are.

Again somebody telling me the truth, which may be
that they're mad at me or whatever, is consistent
with courteousy. As to whether courteous behaviour
is part of who we are--that's entirely up to us.
Genuinely courteous people make a decision
to treat people courteously--unless there is
an overwhelming reason not to--but that
doesn't mean you can't say what you think.
You can be tough, authentic, honest and also
say please and thank you.

I just think when you try deliberately to be nice for the sake of being nice, it shows, and you look plastic.

I think being kind and courteous for the sake of being kind
and courteous
is a good idea--it doesn't look plastic unless
you are hiding or covering up
your real feelings. When one does
express negative feelings it's good
to put some energy into doing it
skillfully--which often means
with reasonable courteousy
I
n real life I'm not really known as a nice person, just a weird one.

There may be a kind of 'niceness' which is
a sort of plasticity, but generally people are
considered nice people who err on the side
of being kind to others, who care about others,
who see courteousy as being part of that,
who have the ability to put themselves second
for the sake of others. People who are
nice in that way can be quite real and tough.
It doesn't mean that one goes about
seething with unexpressed resentment.

Finally we are what we choose to be
over the long haul, in my experience.
Imperfectly, of course. Best

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:25 am
by Jack
jim, for a second I was wondering why your paragraphs went all the way over! :lol:

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 3:41 am
by madguy
Among many very good points that Mike made, one that people who get upset here and other places on the internet often forget (or ignore) is that when they don't like the way something is going or being said, and it offends them, there's always the "Delete" key! :)

~Larry

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 7:36 am
by mvhplank
Michael Burke wrote:Many of us like to think we are broad minded and that we are tolerant of others and that we like to see all sides of an issue, but then someone comes along and this person is intolerant, rude, and narrow minded, and demands his own way.

What happens then is that we tend to forget all our tolerance and all our ability to see both sides of the issue and want to come down hard on that bigoted, ignorant person. The problem is that, all too often, we, in the process of attacking this threat, can become like them. It is easy to be tolerant of tolerant people, but very difficult to be tolerant of people that hate us without good reason.
This reminds me of a quote I heard--I had to go look it up:

<blockquote>
I am firm. You are obstinate. He is a pig-headed fool.
--Katherine Whitehorn
</blockquote>

M

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 8:16 am
by jim stone
Cranberry wrote:jim, for a second I was wondering why your paragraphs went all the way over! :lol:
Ooops! I will try harder.

Manners?

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:51 pm
by McHaffie
Well since we've gotten off onto manners, this is a perfect opportunity for me to get these particular matters off my chest. These obviously relate to the central US and may or may not apply to the rest of the world.

I was raised to open the door for people, hello's, firm handshakes, smiles, etc. and a firm sincerity in all. I think all the above are very simple and "common courtesies" so to speak. I don't mind if they are not offered to me, but I find it very odd when people get upset when they are offered to them!

I've had 2 experiences where I have seen a woman walking up to a door behind me (most of the time you can see peoples reflection coming up behind you) I smiled and opened the door as I always do for anyone (whether it be man woman or child) and she actually stopped short, shot me a look that could slice hardened steel and proudly announced "I can get that for myself thank you" with a tone in her voice that pretty much made me feel like I was being sent to my room. After a couple of seconds of shock I went on in and noticed she let the door completelly shut and waited a full 2 or 3 seconds before entering. The 2nd time wasn't quite so bad, but basically the same, and it was a woman in this instance as well.

Now I'm not for certain, but the last time I checked, I didn't realize that opening a door for someone was considered a sexist or chauvinistic act... or is it??? Man it just ruined my day trying to figure out if I perhaps gave off a bad vibe or smiled wrong or something. I realize it wasn't my fault per say, but wow. How rude is that? I certainly never meant any disrespect!

On the flip side however, I will never forget the time I had the pleasure of holding the door open for an older gentleman who was in his paint spatterred overalls and truck. As he passed by me on his way in, he gave me a hearty double-slap on the shoulder, a big grin, and a loud "Thank you m' boy!" Now THAT absolutely made my day.

It's amazing how simple gestures of sincere kindness and a sincere appreciation can make such an impact.

Ok, I'm now officially off of my soap box. Feel free to comment, tear down, fix up, do some trimming or edging, maybe a little landscaping, or whatever you'd like to whatever I've said or not said or otherwise ;)

Take care all,
John

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 1:57 pm
by brad maloney
I don't know if she was as worried about womans rights as she was about thinking that you were just trying to land her in bed. I got maced by a $#@! once when I tried to return her wallet to her - she had dropped it. Funny - you can't be nice to people without them thinking that your just trying to get something from them.

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:06 pm
by Nanohedron
brad maloney wrote:I don't know if she was as worried about womans rights as she was about thinking that you were just trying to land her in bed. I got maced by a $#@! once when I tried to return her wallet to her - she had dropped it. Funny - you can't be nice to people without them thinking that your just trying to get something from them.
Maced? Gee, Brad, I was under the impression that that was all part of Rhode Island courtship rituals! Esoteric stuff, that...

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:12 pm
by brad maloney
That was in Manhattan, I said "scuse me, scuse me you dropped your wallet" & she shouted "Help Rape!". This was at 5 in the afternoon on 3rd ave around 20th or so. The stupid dingbat was probably from Oklahoma or something. A crowd gathered & an officer came to ask if i wanted to press charges, I declined for the right to curse her out. She got her wallet & found out that her #$@! isn't made out of gold.

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 2:14 pm
by Nanohedron
Ah, Manhattan, then. That had to be surreal.

Re: Manners?

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 3:02 pm
by Rando7
McHaffie wrote:
I was raised to open the door for people, hello's, firm handshakes, smiles, etc. and a firm sincerity in all. I think all the above are very simple and "common courtesies" so to speak. I don't mind if they are not offered to me, but I find it very odd when people get upset when they are offered to them!
That's the way I was raised, too. I generally hold the door whether the other person is male or female and luckily have never had any problems with anyone being offended. Maybe it's just this part of the country - sometimes when I'm walking with a friend or co-worker it's practically a race to see who gets to hold the door open for the other. The only downside is when you're at a store and you end up holding the door for a long procession, though generally someone will smile and say thanks which as you say makes it worthwhile.

WOW!!!! COOL!

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 3:47 pm
by McHaffie
Wow, never been maced for returning a wallet, but I did get maced by the police once when I lived in an apartment complex for a year! :D

A neighbor called the police on her ex-boyfriend who had been beating on her door for the last oh... 10 min or so, and then hollering at her along with beating on the door for another 10 min, and just when the police ran up the staairs I opened the door to tell the guy to shut the he** up already, and you guessed it... they got the wrong guy. :lol: I was maced and pegged to the floor before anyone figured out what was going on, and the ex-boyfriend took off, got away, then they caught him a few hours later.

Eyes burned pretty bad for a while, my right shoulder was hurting for a couple days from the rip around behind the back... I did my best to be u nderstanding but hey... not even a "oops, sorry about that buddy.. " sheesh! :lol:

Some people! :D

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:46 pm
by Nanohedron
BTW, Brad, I was wondering: could you help me with the difference on "$#@!" and "#$@!"? Seems a bit subtle... :lol:

Posted: Thu Jul 10, 2003 4:53 pm
by jim stone
the dingbat was more likely from NYC than
from Oklahoma, where simple acts of
kindness tend to be viewed with considerably
less suspicion.

Odds are the lady with the door was
a feminist of the strident sort,
and this is one of those places
where Ms. Manner's advice, which I detailed
above, can come in handy.

I used to be very confused about such
folks, because I was sympathetic to
women's rights, yet I was getting jumped
on for innocent behaviour. On one occasion
at the Boulder Youth Hostel there
was on the desk a picture of a very
beautiful young woman and I sighed
as I passed by: 'What a lovely girl!'
'She isn't a 'girl', Jim; she's 21 and
she's a WOMAN!' the receptionist
yelled at me. She had just returned
from a feminist camp in another state
where she had slept with another woman
and 'enjoyed it very much.'

I will not describe here what happened to
me at a picnic when, umpiring a co-ed
softball game, I made the fatal error
of announcing: 'Man on first!'

My eyes were opened by a senior

philosopher of international fame,
when I asked him what to do about
such people and he answered:
'Have nothing to do with them.'
That helped immensely. Obnoxious
behaviour in a cause one appreciates
is still obnoxious, and the quiet
'Excuse me' followed by lasting
departure is effective, graceful,
and most likely to get the
person to stop.

I spent a year studying in Cambridge Mass
in the early 80s. Ravishing, brilliant professors
of English from Tufts, etc, would call
me up and ask me on dates.
I went gladly! After several meetings
I would suggest that some of
the more pleasant aspects of
embodiment might be investigated
in my apartment. The response
was always a bitter laugh and
this pronouncement: 'The only
meaningful relationship I've
ever had was with another woman. My
psychotherapist said that it might be
time for me to try a man, and I thought
you might be the one, but I see now
that I'm not ready, after all.'
I realized that these women did
this to 30 or 40 men a year.
By the time I left Cambridge
I never opened a door for a woman,
lifted something heavy for a woman,
defended a woman against assault,
or did anything that might suggest
that any woman anywhere might be
less strong than Arnold Schwarznegger.
This enabled me to escape with my
skin, if not my psyche, intact.

Then I went to teach in New Orleans.
Leaving the Humanities Building with
a ravishing brilliant professor of
English we approached together the
big glass door. She was slightly ahead of
me and I knew better than to make
the slightest helpful motion; unfortunately
she wasn't emancipated, was used to
Southern men, and nearly broke her
nose when she walked into it. Best