Mr.Gumby wrote:Like Mike I would be a bit suspicious about the idea of starting a cut in mid air and describing landing on a note as a 'cut'. Surely, you can do it by going into it tonguing the note but in reality I am not sure how many players whose music I admire would actually go about things that way.
But 1. you're not starting it in mid air if you're using it to separate two notes of the same pitch, and 2. there's no
need to tongue it even when you are (ie moving from one note to another).
Mr.Gumby wrote:Mike (and Peter as well), you are really overthinking this, just listen to how something is played and imitate that as best you can. Seeking validation in writers like GL is not the way to go.
As stated before, I was 'only trying to demonstrate to Mike that it doesn't have to be his way'...
Mr.Gumby wrote:Also noting that even Mr.Gumby's now linking to the written word!
I think you missed my point altogether.
So I don't think that's fair...
Nothing against reading, it broadens the mind. Reading Pat Mitchell, who is one of the closest and most detailed listeners you'll ever meet in this music, may (or may not as the case may be) set your synapses working. There a few thoughts and ideas there that may help one develop their own thinking about these matters. What I don't think as helpful is turning this sort of discussion into some sort of an academic exercise, footnotes and all. The answer to the sort of questions we're discussing here lies in the music of the great stylists, the written word can be helpful when it's descriptive, it becomes a problem when taken (or used) as being prescriptive.
Because there's precious little difference between me quoting Larsen and you pointing to Mitchell when they're both interesting (on which note, thanks for the links!) and neither replaces listening, doing and thinking for yourself. On which note, this has surely long since gone past 'storm in a tea cup' proportions when we have so much common ground, and my only reason for returning to it yet again is (nothing to do with the bl**dy cuts!) frustration at continued misunderstandings.