To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Denny »

highwood wrote:2 thumbholes, and a low pinkie hole - why not not go the whole way and have ten holes... now the only question is what would this tenth hole do?
G#

'course ya gotta learn to run T3 & T4 together most of the time...
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Thomaston
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:43 am
antispam: No
Location: Auburn, AL

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Thomaston »

Upper pinkie for G#, I hadn't even thought of that. I really need to get back into making pvc whistles. That would make for a fun challenge. :)
User avatar
Peter Duggan
Posts: 3224
Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 5:39 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I'm not registering, I'm trying to edit my profile! The field “Tell us something.” is too short, a minimum of 100 characters is required.
Location: Kinlochleven
Contact:

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Peter Duggan »

Thomaston wrote:Upper pinkie for G#, I hadn't even thought of that.
Logically, it would have to be T3 for G# and T4 for G with open holes (no closed-standing keys)...
And we in dreams behold the Hebrides.

Master of nine?
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Denny »

yer one of those people that don't understand what I say, aren't ya
Denny wrote:'course ya gotta learn to run T3 & T4 together most of the time...
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Thomaston
Posts: 1285
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 8:43 am
antispam: No
Location: Auburn, AL

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Thomaston »

Peter Duggan wrote:
Thomaston wrote:Upper pinkie for G#, I hadn't even thought of that.
Logically, it would have to be T3 for G# and T4 for G with open holes (no closed-standing keys)...
I was thinking it would work like xxox oooo
User avatar
Denny
Posts: 24005
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2003 11:29 am
antispam: No
Location: N of Seattle

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Denny »

I thought :really: like who'd a thunk it, eh

Code: Select all

G  TXXXX  OOOO
G# TXXXO  OOOO
oh, BTW, for youse that's managed not to encounter the open/closed G# key issue
g'day! do enjoy :)
Picture a bright blue ball just spinning, spinning free
It's dizzying, the possibilities. Ashes, Ashes all fall down.
User avatar
Aanvil
Posts: 2589
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 6:12 pm
antispam: No
Location: Los Angeles

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by Aanvil »

I played the C holed varient that MtGuru has this last weekend. It was a little odd at first but after a few minutes I could use it very easily. It's a really nice whistle ta boot.

It gives you a really nice c when you need it.

I suspect we've all grown so used to having a weak veiled Cnat that we don't even realize we might need it. Once you hear the difference the choice is pretty easy.

I have a C key on my flute so it is not such a difficult idea to wrap my head around.

Now, I won't be running out and drilling holes in all my whistles but I might consider buying a new one with it.
Aanvil

-------------------------------------------------

I am not an expert
User avatar
MTGuru
Posts: 18663
Joined: Sat Sep 30, 2006 12:45 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: San Diego, CA

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by MTGuru »

Aanvil wrote:I played the C holed varient that MtGuru has this last weekend. It was a little odd at first but after a few minutes I could use it very easily. It's a really nice whistle ta boot.
You were, like, totally grooving on that thumbhole, Aanvil. It was downright scary. :lol:

I'll be posting a write-up on the thumbhole and whistle very soon ...
Vivat diabolus in musica! MTGuru's (old) GG Clips / Blackbird Clips

Joel Barish: Is there any risk of brain damage?
Dr. Mierzwiak: Well, technically speaking, the procedure is brain damage.
educciman
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 9:52 am
antispam: No

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by educciman »

Please have fun with checking out my thumbhole-variation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2ScddKL ... ure=relmfu
DavieD
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:39 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Germany - North Sea

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by DavieD »

educciman wrote:Please have fun with checking out my thumbhole-variation.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x2ScddKL ... ure=relmfu
educciman's viedeo shows, that we can find two different versions of thumbholes.

1. I will call it the "Burke type" (I think it is the most common one)
In this case you open the thumbhole only for the Cnat (while playing xoo ooo)
You are free to play the whistle exactly as any other whistle.
And you can tape the thumbhole, if you don't like it and the whistle works as any other.

2. <edited>Let's call it "additional type" thumbhole.
In this case, you have to open the thumbhole for the Csharp as well. If you don't, the Csharp is flat.
educciman is using this type in his video.
So, you have to use the thumbhole, or the intonation of the whistle is bad.
You can't tape the thumbhole on this whistles.

I think, it is important to know, what type of thumbhole a whistle has before ordering a whistle.

I favour the first version, because I'm not willing to learn a new Csharp fingering that only works on specific whistles.

BTW: The position on educciman's thumbhole seems very unusual to me.
It seems to sit more at the side than at the bottom of the barrel.
Last edited by DavieD on Tue May 08, 2012 8:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
hans
Posts: 2259
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've been making whistles since 2010 in my tiny workshop at my home. I've been playing whistle since teenage times.
Location: Moray Firth, Scotland
Contact:

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by hans »

DavieD wrote:2. I will call it the "Bracker type", for Hans whistles with a thumbhole work like this. educciman is using this type in his video.
In this case, you have to open the thumbhole for the Csharp as well. If you don't do it, the Csharp is flat.
So, you have to use the thumbhole, or the intonation of the whistle is bad.
You can't tape the thumbhole on this whistles.

I think, it is important to know this before ordering a whistle.
I like to correct that: it is true that I've built some whistles which needed the thumb hole open for a good C#, but I have for a long time designed the finger holes on my whistles, so that the thumb hole does not need to be opened for the C#, and the whistle has a good cross-fingered Cnat as well as the thumb hole Cnat (if one is requested). So a thumb hole could indeed be taped over without upsetting the intonation of C#. It is just an additional hole, without the locations or diameters of the other holes being redesigned. Perhaps it may be called more correctly an "additional type" thumb hole.

But please also note that if the tone holes are designed to give a good cross-fingered Cnat with OXXOOO (on a six hole whistle), the C# will be a bit flat, and needs to be pushed a bit. If you want to play a C# in equal temperament you will need to push it even more. There is no way to avoid that. Using an additional thumb hole can correct this anomaly, as you can raise the C# a bit by opening the thumb hole, without resorting to additional air pressure.
DavieD
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:39 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Germany - North Sea

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by DavieD »

Sorry, Hans
I've edited the post, ok?
Cheers, David
R Small
Posts: 313
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 12
Location: Alexandria, Virginia

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by R Small »

I like to raise the thumb for C# (O OOOOOO as opposed to X OOOOOO). This makes the fingering similar to a Boehm flute C# and makes moving chromatically easier since you don't have to flip-flop the index finger and thumb when playing C nat. to C# or C# to C nat. If the whistle is designed to play C# with the thumbhole covered the C# will be a little sharp with the thumbhole open. This can be corrected by taping over part of the first hole, maybe a third to even half of the hole. Of course this will also flatten and possibly ruin the cross-fingered C but if you use thumbhole C exclusively as I do it's not an issue.
User avatar
hans
Posts: 2259
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've been making whistles since 2010 in my tiny workshop at my home. I've been playing whistle since teenage times.
Location: Moray Firth, Scotland
Contact:

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by hans »

DavieD wrote:Sorry, Hans
I've edited the post, ok?
Cheers, David
But what you call #1 "Burke type" I would call "additional type", and #2 I would perhaps call "integrated type" (not such a great name), where the thumb hole is integrated into the design with all the other finger holes, rather than just added to the design layout. I am building according to #1.
DavieD
Posts: 69
Joined: Sat Aug 01, 2009 10:39 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Location: Germany - North Sea

Re: To thumbhole or not to thumbhole - that is the question!

Post by DavieD »

hans wrote:But what you call #1 "Burke type" I would call "additional type", and #2 I would perhaps call "integrated type" (not such a great name), where the thumb hole is integrated into the design with all the other finger holes, rather than just added to the design layout. I am building according to #1.
Do you agree with the following:

1. "standard thumb hole": A thumb hole, that doesn't affect the normal fingering of the whistle. Can be taped to get a normal whistle.

2. "Boehm type thumbhole": A thumb hole than can be opend to play Cnat, but has to be opend for C#
"Boehm type" according to:
R Small wrote:I like to raise the thumb for C# (O OOOOOO as opposed to X OOOOOO). This makes the fingering similar to a Boehm flute C# ....
Post Reply