Question about bouncing notes

The Ultimate On-Line Whistle Community. If you find one more ultimater, let us know.
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Question about bouncing notes

Post by Wanderer »

Ok, "bouncing notes" is probably not a good technical term. I'm talking about those sections of notes, notably in reels, where the notes bounce tween the upper and lower octaves on the whistle.

I was forced to think about these more while evaluating Jerry Freeman's tweaked Sweetone, and I remembered something that's has puzzled me since I started going to session.

Let's take one tune as an example, the Glass of Beer. Here's an ABC of it from JC's:
X:1
T:The Glass of Beer
R:reel
D:Oisin: Over the Moor to Maggie.
D:Frankie Gavin: Up and Away
Z:id:hn-reel-77
M:C|
F:http://jc.tzo.net/~jc/music/abc/Contra/ ... eer_Bm.abc
K:Bm
|: fBB2 fBaB | fBB2 e2de | fBB2 f3e |1 dfaf e2de :|2 dfaf e2fe ||
|: d3e f3e | defd eAA2 | d3e fgfe |1 dfaf e2fe :|2 dfaf e2de |]
The section I'm spcifically referring to covers the first 2 measures, where I've bolded the notes.

When I hear fiddles play this, the B sounds more like a drone note than a distinct note. When I hear whistles play this as written, each note is much more distinct, as a matter of course. But my question has more to do with how this bounce is executed on woodwinds. I've heard a number of flute players and whistlers totally remove the "drone" note when playing this kind of passage, and lengthening the upper octave note. Things end up getting played like:
|: fBB2 f2a2 | f2B2 e2de |
I've heard the "bounce" removed in this way from various players on tunes like Glass of Beer above, Drowsy Maggie, Tam Lin, and Gravel Walk, just off the top of my head. Is it a matter of someone's ear not catching the drone note when they learned the tune, or more of a matter of giving more emphasis to the non-drone notes like a fiddle does? I guess my question is, is this a common or recommended thing to do in some circumstances?

Thoughts anyone? :)
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

Try playing more legato for a change :D


(that was serious, practice a tune like the Morning Dew, try minimise tongueing in the phrase that have your 'bounces' or 'rocking pedal' as Steve calls them)
User avatar
StevieJ
Posts: 2189
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Old hand, active in the early 2000s. Less active in recent years but still lurking from time to time.
Location: Montreal

Post by StevieJ »

Removing the drone note kills the tune, making the passage sound lame and leaden.

Playing more legato will help. I'd particularly suggest not tonguing the "bounce" notes - the ones in the upper octave in your example. I often tongue them in pairs, but tonguing the "pedal" note (the B in your example), which is basically how I'd articulate many of these passages on the fiddle.

Such passages are sometimes rephrased to avoid the "rocking pedal" figure on a particular instrument, or to swap a difficult note with another that fits. (Just listen to fluters playing The Traveller and see how many avoid playing the B in the passage that starts the second part: g2 dg Bgdg). But you shouldn't need to do that very often with a whistle.

(BTW Peter I got the rocking pedal term years ago from Graeme Smith, an ethnomusicologist in Melbourne with a particular interest in Irish music, and AFAIK he coined it.)

Steve
The Weekenders
Posts: 10300
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: SF East Bay Area

Post by The Weekenders »

I agree with Steve. I do everything I can to RETAIN the fiddle "pedal" effect. The upper notes standout and it gives melodic shape. Seen in another way, its almost as if you are playing percussion and using different drums to separate the upper notes and the pedals.

A great tune for playing around with this effect is Franks Reel, the second part.
How do you prepare for the end of the world?
Cayden

Post by Cayden »

StevieJ wrote:
Such passages are sometimes rephrased to avoid the "rocking pedal" figure on a particular instrument, or to swap a difficult note with another that fits.
Steve
On the other hand, quite often new ones are introduced by whistleplayers eg Mary Bergin playing the second part of the Up to your knees in sand, Willie Clancy taking the Morning Dew to the cleaners etc etc
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

StevieJ wrote:Removing the drone note kills the tune, making the passage sound lame and leaden.

Playing more legato will help. I'd particularly suggest not tonguing the "bounce" notes - the ones in the upper octave in your example. I often tongue them in pairs, but tonguing the "pedal" note (the B in your example), which is basically how I'd articulate many of these passages on the fiddle.

Such passages are sometimes rephrased to avoid the "rocking pedal" figure on a particular instrument, or to swap a difficult note with another that fits. (Just listen to fluters playing The Traveller and see how many avoid playing the B in the passage that starts the second part: g2 dg Bgdg). But you shouldn't need to do that very often with a whistle.

(BTW Peter I got the rocking pedal term years ago from Graeme Smith, an ethnomusicologist in Melbourne with a particular interest in Irish music, and AFAIK he coined it.)

Steve
Thanks Steve..this is the kind of information I was looking for...I'm of the same opinion about the drone.

I guess I was asking a style question, and not so much a "how can I play this easier" question...I had just heard enough people drop the drone note that I was starting to think that perhaps I'd missed that lesson somewhere. I was fully expecting someone to post "gee, all whistlers do it that way you ninny." ;)

I remember reading (a couple years ago maybe?) your advice on tonguing the drone rather than bounce note..I wasn't able to do it very cleanly then, but did pick up tonging them in pairs around that time. Maybe I'll give your suggestion another try now that I've got some more skills and see how it goes
User avatar
Scott McCallister
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2003 7:40 am
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 10
Location: Denver, CO

Post by Scott McCallister »

Wanderer wrote:I was fully expecting someone to post "gee, all whistlers do it that way you ninny." ;)
Gee, all whistlers do it that way, you ninny. :D (feel better now?)

On a more serious tone, you have to look at the inherent agility of each respective instrument in order really answer why some instruments do certain things better than others. Octave leaps on a Piano are substantially different than say, a Trombone, or a Guitar or even a whistle. Various string crossings will enable a note to be held in position or even let to ring freely actually sustaining the drone through the next several notes. As far as raw agility goes, I would think that whistle, especially high D, would be among the most agile instruments around. There really wouldn't be a reason to leave those notes out. Perhaps it is just lazy/inexperienced playing. The instrument will support the leap, the player simply isn't executing well.
There's and old Irish saying that says pretty much anything you want it to.

Image
User avatar
Whitmores75087
Posts: 798
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 6:00 pm
Please enter the next number in sequence: 1
Location: Dundalk, Ireland (now living in TX)
Contact:

Post by Whitmores75087 »

Hey Wanderer, let's talk about this on Friday.
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

Whitmores75087 wrote:Hey Wanderer, let's talk about this on Friday.
Okee doke :)

I used to hear this a lot in Houston from certain guys, and after a while, I just quit thinking about it, though it's always niggled at me in the back of my mind. When I posted the sweetone review, it reminded me :)

Incidentally, Joe of the Flying Fish Sailors (for those who know this ren-faire band) drops the drone note on Drowsy Maggie on their Remnant Stew album..which is when I first ran into the phenomenon and started thinking about it.

I've made some small clips (<10 seconds, should be legal Fair Use under copyright since this is a scholarly discussion)
Flying Fish showing what I mean by dropping drone note on Drowsy Maggie.
L.E. McCullough in his 121 irish session tunes set, with the drone note in.
User avatar
StevieJ
Posts: 2189
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Old hand, active in the early 2000s. Less active in recent years but still lurking from time to time.
Location: Montreal

Post by StevieJ »

Been thinking about this tonguing in pairs business since my last post and wanted to say that I really think that tonguing "patterns" (or bowing patterns) aren't an answer in themselves.

In fact there's any number of ways to tongue or not tongue passages like this and have it sound good. The same patterns can also be made to sound, um, not so good. There are more subtle things at work I think than simply where you tongue, and only your ears (or someone else's) can tell you if something is working or not.

In other words doing what I suggested above won't of itself guarantee a good flow or feel. In fact I just tried that passage in the Glass of Beer at home and was surprised to find that I generally don't do it like that at all. :)

The flow is definitely the thing!
User avatar
colomon
Posts: 2140
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Whistle player, aspiring C#/D accordion and flute player, and aspiring tunesmith. Particularly interested in the music of South Sligo and Newfoundland. Inspired by the music of Peter Horan, Fred Finn, Rufus Guinchard, Emile Benoit, and Liz Carroll.

I've got some compositions up at http://www.harmonyware.com/tunes/SolsTunes.html
Location: Midland, Michigan
Contact:

Post by colomon »

StevieJ wrote:Playing more legato will help. I'd particularly suggest not tonguing the "bounce" notes - the ones in the upper octave in your example. I often tongue them in pairs, but tonguing the "pedal" note (the B in your example), which is basically how I'd articulate many of these passages on the fiddle.
This advice keeps haunting me. I can't even imagine how you would tongue in a pattern like this; it seems like it would be going completely against the grain of the music. I don't suppose you could provide a recording?
Sol's Tunes (new tune 2/2020)
User avatar
Wanderer
Posts: 4461
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 10:49 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: I've like been here forever ;)
But I guess you gotta filter out the spambots.
100 characters? Geeze.
Location: Tyler, TX
Contact:

Post by Wanderer »

colomon wrote:
StevieJ wrote:Playing more legato will help. I'd particularly suggest not tonguing the "bounce" notes - the ones in the upper octave in your example. I often tongue them in pairs, but tonguing the "pedal" note (the B in your example), which is basically how I'd articulate many of these passages on the fiddle.
This advice keeps haunting me. I can't even imagine how you would tongue in a pattern like this; it seems like it would be going completely against the grain of the music. I don't suppose you could provide a recording?
You know, I was just thinking of asking that very question. I guess I just can't figure out how to do what's described...
User avatar
StevieJ
Posts: 2189
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Old hand, active in the early 2000s. Less active in recent years but still lurking from time to time.
Location: Montreal

Post by StevieJ »

Wanderer wrote:
colomon wrote:
StevieJ wrote:Playing more legato will help. I'd particularly suggest not tonguing the "bounce" notes - the ones in the upper octave in your example. I often tongue them in pairs, but tonguing the "pedal" note (the B in your example), which is basically how I'd articulate many of these passages on the fiddle.
This advice keeps haunting me. I can't even imagine how you would tongue in a pattern like this; it seems like it would be going completely against the grain of the music. I don't suppose you could provide a recording?
You know, I was just thinking of asking that very question. I guess I just can't figure out how to do what's described...
Guys, it's really not very complicated, you know - just do what it says :)

OK, <a href="http://www.rogermillington.com/siamsa/b ... .mp3">here are few examples</a> recorded in haste, starting with an easier passage (Boys of Bluehill) to show you the principle. In The Gravel Walk, I tend to tongue the first high A, which is on the beat, but then use the pairs pattern. I also usually tongue the high A in Glass of Beer but didn't here for the sake of the example.

But as I said in my later post, I'm not sure whether patterns matter very much. This is the just the way I tend to do things, probably based on my fiddler's instincts, take it for what it's worth.

Does this help?
User avatar
colomon
Posts: 2140
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Whistle player, aspiring C#/D accordion and flute player, and aspiring tunesmith. Particularly interested in the music of South Sligo and Newfoundland. Inspired by the music of Peter Horan, Fred Finn, Rufus Guinchard, Emile Benoit, and Liz Carroll.

I've got some compositions up at http://www.harmonyware.com/tunes/SolsTunes.html
Location: Midland, Michigan
Contact:

Post by colomon »

Well, at least it makes it clear it is possible to do it and make it sound good.

Don't think I'm going to start tonguing passages like this, though. :)
Sol's Tunes (new tune 2/2020)
User avatar
StevieJ
Posts: 2189
Joined: Thu May 17, 2001 6:00 pm
antispam: No
Please enter the next number in sequence: 8
Tell us something.: Old hand, active in the early 2000s. Less active in recent years but still lurking from time to time.
Location: Montreal

Post by StevieJ »

colomon wrote:Well, at least it makes it clear it is possible to do it and make it sound good.

Don't think I'm going to start tonguing passages like this, though. :)
To answer your previous comment about "going against the grain of the music": much in Irish music is counter-intuitive, or goes against the grain if you like, for people coming from another background. I feel qualified to say this because I learned violin before taking up fiddle.

But as far as "the music" is concerned, there shouldn't be anything surprising about this pattern, because slurring across beats and bar lines is almost a defining feature of most styles of playing Irish music, esp. in fiddling but also in flute and whistle playing.

I think it's safe to say that a majority of fiddle players from the south and west of Ireland anyway would not change bow on the downbeats in passages like this.

Many people learning Irish music on the whistle would instinctively tongue the downbeats, but that IMO is much harder to make sound good (if indeed it's possible to make it sound good - I'm not sure it is) than the reverse, and that is why I suggested this alternative approach to Wanderer.

S
Post Reply